Legislature(1995 - 1996)
08/19/1996 01:00 PM Senate MHS
Audio | Topic |
---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SENATE TASK FORCE ON THE ALASKA MARINE HIGHWAY SYSTEM Seward, Alaska August 19, 1996 1:00 p.m. TASK FORCE MEMBERS Senator Robin Taylor Senator Drue Pearce Senator John Torgerson ALSO IN ATTENDANCE Representative Gary Davis Patty Walen, City Manager & Port Director, Homer, AK John Burns, representing the Alaska Railroad WITNESS REGISTER Gary Hayden, System Director Alaska Marine Highway System Damon Jorgensen, Port Engineer Alaska Marine Highway System Mike Downing, Marine Superintendent Alaska Marine Highway System Captain Kelly Mitchell Alaska Marine Highway System Mayor Tim Volstad Seldovia, AK Mayor Louis Bencardino Seward, AK Jim Pruitt, President of Seward Ship's Drydock, Inc. Seward, AK Dennis Erlandson, Port Harbor Director Homer, AK Don Braun, City Administrator Chignik, AK ACTION NARRATIVE TAPE ONE, SIDE A SENATOR TAYLOR , chairing the Senate Task Force on the Alaska Marine Highway System in Seward, called the meeting to order and announced the presence of Senator Torgerson, as well as noting that Myrna Maynard would be representing Senator Pearce and participating via teleconference from Anchorage. He said the task force would first go over questions that were raised at the last meeting and the responses sent back by Mr. Hayden. SENATOR TORGERSON referred to a packet of requested information including the 1991 master plan, the shore condition survey, the bar survey, service alternatives, etc., which he had just recently received from Mr. Hayden. He said he had not had an opportunity to completely go through all of the material so he would defer a lot of his questions until he could look it over. SENATOR TORGERSON said he had requested the meeting to be held in Seward and he, personally, wanted to focus on some of the issues raised on the Tustemena and also the ocean going vessel that will be coming on line in a few years. He noted he recently traveled on the Tustemena from Valdez to Seward which gave him the opportunity to speak with the crew about the system and to get their input on issues they would like to see addressed by the task force. He added it is his intent to write a letter to Mr. Haden outlining those concerns. He would also like some discussion on the issue of home porting in Seward, as well as discussion on the construction of the new dock facility, which is a partnership project between the City of Seward, the cruise ship industry, the Alaska Railroad, and a requested $3,000,000 in federal funds that was requested in the budget. GARY HAYDEN , System Director, Alaska Marine Highway System, Department of Transportation & Pubic Facilities, speaking to the home porting issue, stated he currently does not have any plans, nor is he making plans to recommend the home port of Seward be changed. He said it is an issue that seems to come up every once in awhile, but he reiterated that it is not an issue that is being worked on today. Addressing the new dock facility in Seward, Mr. Hayden said the Tustemena originally was docking in downtown Seward and was later moved out to the railroad dock. He said when that move was made, there was a deterioration in the facilities and service to the city, so he agrees that the facilities need to be upgraded, however, it then comes to the question of how it is going to be paid for. Currently, it is in the Surface Transportation Improvement Priority list (STIP), however, it is in one of the outer years, which he understands is inconsistent with what the city's needs are for the cruise ship dock, as well as the railroad's needs. He said it is a matter of finding money within the federal highway system appropriation to move that project along. However, all of the capital monies that the department will be receiving next year from the federal highway system will be going into the new vessel, so he doesn't see that happening in 1998. SENATOR TORGERSON said the money was approved in the budget, but what was needed from the Administration was to amend the STIP to put it in there. MR. HAYDEN related that on the previous day he asked Tom Brigham, Director of the Division of Statewide Planning, about the project. He was told there will be a meeting at the end of the month to look at the STIP projects for next year, and Mr. Brigham offered that if they have more updated information than they had last year, it will be taken to the table and talked about again. He added that the last time he saw the project there were preliminary drawings that were sketches to that point, and he does not know where the project has evolved to in the last 12 months. SENATOR TORGERSON pointed out that the dock expansion isn't just a ferry expansion; the cruise ships that come through that port feed all of Alaska economically. He reiterated that the marine highway portion qualifies for the $3,000,000 that is already in the budget, and it comes down to amending the STIP. MR. HAYDEN assured Senator Torgerson that if there is more information available, he will take it back to the commissioner and the people who make the decisions about the priorities. MR. HAYDEN noted that in addition to the packet he sent out to the task force members on August 13, he was also providing them with a summary of the Southwest Alaska ferry traffic analysis, a copy of the system's budget briefing, and an explanation of his goal of $1.6 million in cost reductions. SENATOR TAYLOR said in looking back through the budget from the year before, Mr. Hayden's numbers show a $259,200 general fund reduction by the legislature, when, in fact, the total amount appropriated by the legislature this year to the ferry system was $20,000 higher than in the previous year. He asked if they were using different numbers. MR. HAYDEN explained the $1.6 million is made up of two things. One was reductions in the appropriation that goes to the front part of the budget. Also there were cost increases in risk management and labor that the system faced which were partially funded. He said Senator Taylor is correct that the number is larger, however, when they went through the whole budgeting process, they had cuts at two points, and then they also had the two points of partially funded cost increases. Since that time, the arbitrator's decision on unearned wages is having cost increases that weren't even considered during the budget cycle. SENATOR TAYLOR commented that as this is being explained to the public, we probably should be more accurate and should be reflecting that they have had increased costs, not budget reduction. MR. HAYDEN agreed, and said he has been fairly cautious in trying to use the term of "cost containment," which is, in his mind, a combination of a little less to spend and higher costs that were not fully funded. He added that he does not want to characterize this as a budget cut and that is why he prepared the new document. SENATOR TAYLOR said he just wanted to make it clear that the majority did not go in and dramatically cut the ferry system; the majority may not have appropriated an additional increase of $1.69 million that the governor would have liked to have had, but the actual number of dollars appropriated was higher. SENATOR TORGERSON said during budget hearings concern was expressed about the $997,000 increase in the Alaska Marine Highway's share to Risk Management, and he asked if Mr. Hayden got any additional back-up, or if he thinks it is a good number. MR. HAYDEN explained that it is his understanding from Risk Management that the Marine Highway's expenditures resulting from personal injuries were going up; that more was being paid out than was being paid in and the reserve had been depleted. Therefore, they increased the risk management charge by $997,000. He added that if there is some way to lower that number, he would like to work on it. There are a couple of things the legislature hasn't had the opportunity to talk about, but there would need to be a public discussion about it because some of the employee unions are opposed to it. One option would be having AMS employees covered by Workers Compensation. SENATOR TORGERSON asked if there was a liability savings with the closing of the bars on the system. MR. HAYDEN responded that there wasn't. SENATOR TORGERSON noted that a lot of ferry workers aren't in any kind of RIP program, and he asked which unions the RIP program applies to within his department. MR. HAYDEN answered that he has asked that question of the DOT administrative director, but he does not have a complete answer at this point. However, he said he would be real surprised if the vessel employees would qualify under the four basic tests that have to be met, particularly when there has to be a savings shown. He said he hoped to have that information by the next meeting of the task force. SENATOR TAYLOR said he received a copy of a memorandum dated April 30 from Gary Egan, who is the ocean class vessel project manager, and in the memo it clearly indicates that he had been advised by Mr. Hayden that the ferries would no longer be providing full bar service and that included the ocean class vessel. Mr. Egan then issued a letter to HMI advising them to have their subcontractor stop any further work on the design, procurement and markup of the bar, and he had proposed that the area previously occupied by the bar be reconfigured into a reading room. Senator Taylor pointed out that was several days before the legislature adjourned, and he asked Mr. Hayden why wasn't the Transportation Committee or the Finance Committee or any of the people interested in a $85 million ferry told about this decision during the legislative session. MR. HAYDEN replied that the issue of whether or not they would be able to provide bar service on the ferries was discussed during the legislative session at the Senate and House finance subcommittee level, and it was mentioned as one of the possibilities for cost reduction if their budget was at a certain level. He didn't know the date the commissioner signed the decision document on closing the bars, but he had the direction that that was the way they were going and that is why that decision was made at this particular time. SENATOR TAYLOR said he checked with the people on the Senate Finance Subcommittee, and they didn't indicate to him that they felt it was an either/or situation or that a choice was being made. They said at the meeting Mr. Hayden outlined a whole series of different things that would occur to the system if certain funding levels weren't met. The people that he talked with did not feel that they were making any intentional decision through the funding level that a specific activity would no longer take place. He said several of the vessels currently operating have been around for about 33 years, and the decision that Mr. Hayden made was apparently based upon some overall thoughts about the budget at that time. Now he and the commissioner have made a decision that is going to affect the new $85 million vessel for the next 30 some years of its operation by intentionally removing the bar from it and reconfiguring the space for something else. He told Mr. Hayden he thinks it's a very dramatic and major decision that he has made, and the people involved on finance at the subcommittee level certainly did not feel they were briefed that if, in fact, he didn't get a sufficient level of funding, that the bars were going to disappear and that the bar on the new ferry was going to disappear. MR. HAYDEN said during the budget deliberation talks that was on the list of budget impacts. The charge they have is to live within their means, and so they look for strategies as to how to reduce their costs. One of the ways to reduce the costs was to reduce the manning levels. He said there aren't a lot of tools available to the system when you take into consideration the contracts, the mandatory service levels as to where you can make decisions to reduce costs. The closing of the bars was one of those as there are several other action items that are their list that they are working on to do. He said he is sorry that the legislative people who were reviewing it didn't understand what they were talking about, but they did talk about it. SENATOR TAYLOR reiterated that he doesn't think anybody in the legislature, at least anyone he is aware of, had the least idea that a major change was going to made in the design of the services to be provided on that new $85 million ferry. He told Mr. Hayden if he can find somebody in the legislature that he thinks knew that and would be willing to testify or write a letter to him to that effect, he would be happy to reverse that comment publicly. MR. HAYDEN responded that he doesn't make threats, that he tries to go the legislature and speak the truth on these budget impacts. SENATOR TAYLOR asked Mr. Hayden if he would agree that as far as he knows nobody in the legislature was aware of the fact that he pulled the bar off of the new ferry before that session adjourned. MR. HAYDEN agreed with his statement. SENATOR TAYLOR asked Mr. Hayden what revenue source he is looking to on the new vessel that will replace the revenues lost off the bar. MR. HAYDEN responded it would be in food service. SENATOR TAYLOR asked Mr. Hayden what savings the system had after they reduced the bar service on the Aurora. He noted at the last hearing a captain on the Aurora said they had lost revenue of $3,000 a week since the bar went down. MR. HAYDEN responded that they saved on the time that the person was doing bartending and that person is now doing food services, which saves in overtime in that department. He added they could have reduced the manning by one person on both the Aurora and the LaConte and still have met Coast Guard requirements, however, they didn't do so. Mr. Hayden also pointed out that in 1995, overall the system lost $127,000 through providing bar service. There was extensive discussion on information provided by Mr. Hayden relating to figures representing personnel costs, as well as a breakdown on the revenue and expense by vessel. SENATOR TORGERSON asked why the bar was being closed on the Columbia if it is making money. MR. HAYDEN clarified that the bar isn't being closed on the Columbia. He also noted that the Bartlett and the Tustemena will continue to sell beer and wine, but they will not have full-time bartenders or bartender positions; a steward will make the sale on those two vessels. SENATOR TAYLOR suggested that if they are really looking to save money off of some personnel within the system and they have people who do specific functions, it would seem if there were an accounting method by which a cost could be attached to those functions and a revenue source from them, that the person to be laid would be the person who costs the most and generates the least amount of money. Instead, it appears to him they are going at it backwards. He said he doesn't know of an employee on the vessel who generates as much money as the bartender does from services provided on board the vessel and who takes less money to subsidize his or her position. He said he is trying to figure out why we would want to have less revenue for our ferry service, and this will have a significant impact on revenues. MR. HAYDEN responded that the revenue will go down, but so will the costs. TAPE ONE, SIDE B Number 001 SENATOR TORGERSON inquired as to the number of lay-offs on the vessels Mr. Hayden anticipates to realize his goal of $1.6 million in cost reduction. MR. HAYDEN responded that he is not necessarily looking at vessels for laying off people. He is looking at other items such as overtime reductions, spending less money in overall operations, food services, manning levels during the winter months, as well as one other vessel position. SENATOR TAYLOR then opened the meeting to public comment. TIM VOLSTAD , Mayor of Seldovia, referring to a handout relating to Southwest Alaska ports, observed that Cordova and Kodiak need the Tustemena; however, Valdez, Homer and Seward have a road. He said Seldovia needs the Tustemena. He questioned why, when the Bartlett and other ferries are running in Prince William Sound, the Tustemena needs to come to Seward in the summer months. He pointed out that Seldovia has had very little service during the winter months for the last five years, and he questioned how much service it will have this coming winter season. He also asked if the new $85 million ocean class vessel will be servicing the Kenai Peninsula. MR. HAYDEN responding to the Seward and Valdez issue, said he would provide Mayor Volstad with a copy of the systems' annual traffic volume report that shows what the volume is in that area. He also said this winter the Tustemena will be serving Homer, Kodiak and Seldovia, as well as the Cordova/Valdez run. The Tustemena just finished a five-phase project and there is no federal project planned for it this winter. It was out of service last year for the installation of a new engine. He added that the thing that will affect the Tustemena in the future will be regulatory projects and demands that get placed on the system. Concerning the new vessel, it will serve Southeast Alaska as a mainline vessel, primarily in the summer months, and it will be available and is being designed to fill in for the Tustemena when the Tustemena is off line like it was last winter, but it will not initiate any new service on the Kenai Peninsula. SENATOR TORGERSON commented that Seldovia is land locked and not having ferry service seven months a year is a major concern to the mayor. LOUIS BENCARDINO , Mayor of Seward, said over the years the ferry system has put in docks in other communities, whereas Seward has always leased docking facilities to the system. Now, when they want to upgrade and build a new facility, they seem to have a problem getting the support from the ferry system. The City of Seward has been working on a partnership project that involves the cruise ship industry and the Alaska Railroad, and the only they needed was a portion from the state. He referred to the money that was allocated for a project in his area, the Hope Bridge that came in at $10 million under bid, and expressed his displeasure that the $10 million was quickly reallocated to another district before his community had a chance to secure that money for a project in their own district like the docking facility. Mayor Bencardino also spoke to his concern with taking the vessels of the Alaska Marine Highway System out of state for maintenance. He said it doesn't make sense to spend money to take care of people in Louisiana when there are people in Alaska out of jobs. Mayor Bencardino said he knows the STIP program for the dock could have been moved up if the Administration had wanted to do so, but it seems like when we have something that makes sense, we have a hard time getting the state working with us. He reiterated that the City of Seward has got private enterprise working with them and then the state lets them down. MR. HAYDEN said he understands Seward's desire to have the state fund their joint-use facility, which he doesn't disagree with. The dilemma he and DOT find themselves in is that the state gets $220 million a year in federal highway funds, however, the list of priorities and needs and concerns is pretty significant. He thinks it is over a billion dollars worth of competition that goes into that, so it is a matter of setting those priorities for competing needs, which is a difficult task to do. MAYOR BENCARDINO interjected that the $10 million from the Hope Bridge project should have keyed in to take care of problems in his district, but that didn't happen. He said when he talked to the commissioner about the dock project, he felt that the commissioner thought it was a good idea, but that he didn't get the support from either the people under him or the people above him. MR. HAYDEN responded that he doesn't make those decisions, although he does get to participate in the scoring and discussion about the community road projects. MR. HAYDEN asked Mayor Bencardino where the project is in securing the other funds. MAYOR BENCARDINO responded that everything came to stop when the state failed to support the project, although they still have got the commitment from the other entities. He also restated his concern that the City of Seward was not able to retain at least part of the $10 million from the Hope Bridge project so that they could have gone forward with this project. MR. HAYDEN assured Mayor Bencardino that he would talk to the commissioner about his concern about the out-of-district movement of funds. The discussion then turned to Mayor Bencardino's concern that vessels are being sent out of state for maintenance. He questioned why Washington State can do its own maintenance, and yet Alaska sends its vessels to Louisiana. MR. HAYDEN pointed out that Alaska uses federal monies for maintenance and the Federal Highway Administration requires that the project has to be competitively bid. DAMON JORGENSEN , Port Engineer, Alaska Marine Highway System, clarified that the Washington State ferries do not use any federal money whatsoever for the overhaul or the construction of their ferry system; they use state tax money and all of their federal money goes towards the highway projects. MIKE DOWNING , Marine Superintendent, Alaska Marine Highway System, added that last year the largest single federal project that the system did, outside of the ocean class vessel, was in Seward, which was a $7.8 million contract on the repowering of the Tustemena. REPRESENTATIVE GARY DAVIS asked Mayor Bencardino where the City of Seward is at as far as detailed drawings on the new docking facility. MAYOR BENCARDINO said they had P&D do a draft plan, but they have been hesitant to spend any more money until they know they are getting the support from the state. REPRESENTATIVE DAVIS advised that he thought it would be beneficial to have at least a cost estimate on the specifications for the project ready. JIM PRUITT , President of Seward Ship's Drydock, Inc., in Seward, said Seward Ship's Drydock and Seward's facility is capable of drydocking all of the Alaska Marine Highway System ferries except the Aurora and the LaConte, which are inland ferries. He spoke to an incident where his company was the successful low bidder for a maintenance project on the Aurora a few years ago. However, on its way to Seward the Aurora got into heavy seas in the Gulf of Alaska and was directed to go to Ketchikan for repairs. Since then the Aurora and LaConte have come up for bid with federal money in them and overhaul state money, however, Seward Ship's Drydock was told it was not going to be allowed to bid on the Aurora because it is an inland ferry and it can't make that crossing. His company has talked to masters that have been with the Alaska Marine Highway System, as well as having had a lot of sea time experience, and they have been told that the Aurora can safety be brought across the gulf. They have also talked to the Alaska Marine Highway System numerous times and they get varying opinions, depending on who they talk to, whether this vessel can be brought across or can't. Mr. Pruitt said the reason for building the Ketchikan facility and the Seward facility was to keep these vessels in state, and there has been legislation passed to keep accomplish this as well, but unfortunately, because of the wording in the legislation in it can be interpreted in different ways. He suggested there needs to clarification on that legislation to where those vessels can be kept in state. He said his company would like the opportunity to participate in the fair bidding process and be able to work on Alaska ferries with Alaskans. MR. HAYDEN said he talked to the port captain the previous week about the Aurora crossing the gulf and he received an explanation that it was a safety issue, and it was also a safety issue in conjunction with the sponsons and the structural integrity of the vessel. He had asked Captain Sande, who was bringing the Aurora across the gulf the last time, if he would bring it across this time. Captain Sande said there was no way he was going to bring that vessel across the gulf because of the slamming, because of the sponsons sticking out and catching water and slamming. The captain thought that last time that he was going to lose the ship. Mr. Hayden pointed out it is a matter of not only bringing it across the gulf but also taking it back. Also, the window of opportunity on the Aurora project is very tight schedule to the fire safety work and get it back so that they can then do the LaConte. These projects have to be done in a timely manner so that there isn't an interruption in service. TAPE 2, SIDE A Number 001 SENATOR TAYLOR asked how they can justify sending a vessel to Portland if they are worried about an inland ferry in outside waters. MR. HAYDEN responded that he has been with the system for two years and he hasn't seen a vessel go to Portland, but he said he would research the passage time, the sea states, wave heights, windows of opportunity, etc., all the factors that go into it. The problem he has is ordering the captain of the Aurora to put his vessel in what he considers to be an unsafe condition. SENATOR TAYLOR asked that if there are some federal dollars involved, but the low bid on the Aurora turns out to be Seward, do they lose the federal money because they refuse to bring the Aurora across the gulf. MR. HAYDEN answered no, because it was written in the bid specs that way. SENATOR TORGERSON asked if Mr. Hayden could get a second opinion on the safety of crossing the gulf. MR. HAYDEN agreed that he would get another opinion in writing. CAPTAIN KELLY MITCHELL , Alaska Marine Highway System, testifying from Juneau, clarified it was not Captain Sande that attempted to cross the gulf on the Aurora, it was Captain Hopkins, who he respects as an ocean master that has also sailed on the Tustemena. He said he has discussed this issue a number of times with Mr. Pruitt, and the issue is a matter of safety and the delivery and redelivery of the vessel back to Southeast. It is not a matter of length or size of the vessel, it's the whole configuration. A 35 foot fishing vessel is much more seaworthy in open ocean conditions than a sponson hull ferry vessel that's certificated for inland lakes and bays. SENATOR TAYLOR observed that since the new vessel will be using up the federal funds allocated to the system for a period of two years, maintenance during that two-year period will be all general fund dollars. He then asked why it would be necessary to send a vessel outside for the next two years. MR. HADEN answered that he hasn't entered those years when he has all state general fund monies. This winter the Aurora and the LaConte are receiving fire safety, as well as an upgrade to the Matanuska. Those three vessels, for this winter, are federally funded. Two of them are funded out of FY 96 funds and one is funded in FY 97 funds. SENATOR TAYLOR again asked if there is any reason why the vessels that will require maintenance during that two-year period will have to go outside of the state. MR. HAYDEN responded that they are going to live under the terms of their statute, and that's what they have been doing. SENATOR TAYLOR commented that he was the person who drafted that statute and this state has never lived under the terms of that statute. MR. HAYDEN said where the vessels go depends to some extent on what type of work is being done on them. He doesn't know what the maintenance schedule during that time period is, but he thinks the probability of going out from competitive bid is pretty low. DENNIS ERLANDSON , Port Harbor Director, City of Homer, said one of the questions and one of the concerns the City of Homer has is the condition of the ferry dock, which is now part of the city's responsibility. This past February a letter was sent to the commissioner expressing the concern and also the possibility of a design team being formed with the city and the other users of the dock. He said as he reads the CIP for the ferry service there is a reconnaissance project identified at the end of the century to start the process of deciding whether or not a dock has to be built. He expressed concern that by the year 2000 the dock may be at a point where it is not usable and serviceable, and he suggested looking at that time line and trying to speed it up. His concern for the city is how long do they have to keep the dock going before they start working together as a group and go after a design project. Mr. Erlandson also pointed out that the new ferry will be larger than the Tustemena, which now services Homer on a regular basis, and if the Tustemena was to be out service and had to be replaced with the new vessel, there would be concern about bringing the larger ferry into the existing facility. MR. HAYDEN said as result a of Mr. Erlandson's letter, the dock got placed on the reconnaissance phase. He added there is nothing that inhibits them from sitting down and talking about those needs whenever the city wants to. It's a matter of getting the need identified, coming up with some solutions and getting in line. DON BRAUN , City Administrator, City of Chignik, said the Tustemena serves the City of Chignik and the four other surrounding communities and they consider it a vital link in their economy. He said they share Seldovia's concern about the uncertainty of scheduling. He said, in general, the AMS has attempted to address their concerns and they are appreciative of that. He pointed out that right now fishing drives Chignik's economy, but he envisions that tourism will eventually come more into play, and he asked that be factored into the scheduling of ferry service to their area. Mr. Braun said the City of Chignik has a partnership with the Corps of Engineers that involves state funds for a boat harbor; however, they can't get the state highway people to talk to the state boat harbor people. He suggested they work to integrate programs even if there is a slippage in time. He also noted the City of Chignik has been working on getting a new docking facility in Chignik and that DOT has been responsive and has been working with them in this effort. MR. HAYDEN said in developing the winter schedule they tried to identify all the community needs and to have the communities understand the other community needs. He stressed the need to keep working together so that everybody understands what those feeding powers are in the Tustemena because it can only make so many port calls in a 7-day period. There being no further witnesses to testify, SENATOR TAYLOR said he still had several questions that he would submit in writing to Mr. Hayden. Concerning the bar removal, he like to see the survey that was conducted on Prince of Wales Island, the one used as justification for pulling the bar off the Aurora, as well as a tabulation of comments cards the system has been receiving from passengers on the ferries concerning removing the bars. He reiterated his concern that the system can't get the winter schedules out in a timely manner. SENATOR TAYLOR asked if they not now moving forward to close the bar on the Columbia, is there any likelihood they can be dissuaded from doing that with any of the other vessels before the September 15 deadline. MR. HADEN said he asked that same question last week in the context of how does he deal with the operation within the revenues and the monies that he has available to him; whether or not to change that decision, or whether or not to continue forward with the decision. He said he took a neutral stand, and he was given direction to continue with the closure of the bars. He added that he would pass on the task force's comments once again. SENATOR TAYLOR said that if they really want to lose that income out of the bars, he could promise where he is going to take it the next legislative session; it's all coming out of administration. He said if we are going to start firing people that are generating an income that's keeping that ferry running, then he is going to start firing people that are taking money that's not keeping that ferry running, that's tieing it up in Bellingham and other places. He suggested Mr. Hayden take that one back up to Commissioner Perkins, as well as suggesting that maybe the commissioner should be at the next hearing to explain to people like Mr. Bencardino and others how $10 million gets transferred to another district while a project like the Seward dock goes down the drain. There being no further business to come before the task force, the meeting was adjourned.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|